It is much more likely that the presence of a journalist only added pressure to succeed on the guides. Krakauer is an experienced climber who wanted to provide excellent material for his employer, yet it appears that he overestimated his abilities just as the others did. However, he had doubts regarding his gas tank reserves before 2:00 PM during the summit day, which he failed to deliver to his team leader (Krakauer 205). Krakauer’s account of the events clearly states that people went to Hall for any decision or emergency (Krakauer 91). First of all, this situation was an organizational catastrophe that put each individual’s decisions up for a careful assessment. Into Thin Air allows a reader to understand Krakauer’s point of view, yet it is not sufficient to realize the full extent of the disaster. This paper will examine the accounts of Krakauer and other climbers and analyze the decision-making processes of their teams’ leaders from the collective point of view. In order to understand the entire weight of the situation, reviewing multiple accounts is a suitable approach that may lead to adequate response and prevention of future tragedies akin to the 1997 Everest disaster. The roots of the disaster and the accounts of various participants differ severely, leading to the story being partially disjointed. It remains one of the most challenging events to comprehend fully. The tragedy that occurred in 1996 is known nowadays as the Everest disaster.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |